While a significant proportion of teachers are coming to understand the benefits of using and integrating digital technology into their practice, few are taking the opportunity to consider the transformative effects ICT has had on society and to reconsider the skills and abilities we teach
our students and, more so, the fundamental role of contemporary education. Globalisation, a redefined concept of knowledge, technological advances and the new ways insititutions and organisations operate have forever altered the role of teachers in 21st century schooling (Patton, 2009). Digital leaders need to be providing opportunities for teachers to reimagine teaching and learning in contemporary society and to develop their capabilities accordingly, not to simply ‘bolt on’ digital technology to existing, traditional practice. However, a paradox exists where the common and popular models of professional development designed to support teachers to embrace contemporary pedagogy have proven to be ineffective.
Most teachers receive uninspired and often poor-quality professional development. In my research, Klingner (2004) found that successful professional development programs are those which include teachers as collaborators in the process. Teachers need to take responsibility and need to negotiate their professional learning with school leaders. in my further research the Victorian Department of Education and Training (2005) suggests that teachers need to design professional development which is focused on student outcomes, not just individual teacher needs. This includes using multiple sources of student data and make teacher professional learning student-centred. Lloyd and Cochrane (2006) also suggest teachers need to refer to contemporary learning theory in their design decisions and negotiation of their individual professional development. Schools should adopt (or create) an instructional / teaching and learning model which teachers use as a basis for effective practice.
Finally, teachers and school leaders should ensure the scope of the professional development in each ‘loop’ does not affect changes which are too broad or overwhelming, as teachers may not welcome change that threatens stability or consistency in their classroom or may not complete the cycle if the barriers are too problematic.